GENERAL OBJECTIVE Improving the quality of education and professional training offered by developing the evaluation skills of teaching staff and students from the pedagogical profile, pre-primary/primary school teachers specialization, implicitly improving the results of the certification exams of professional skills and tenure SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: 1. increasing the efficiency of the evaluation of the didactic process for at least 50% of the methodist teachers and primary school teachers, in the period 2021-2023, by diversifying the evaluation methods in the lessons taught or guided in pedagogical training 2. orienting the evaluation process of students from content to competences, in at least 50% of the lessons taught in training, by using alternative evaluation methods, in the period 2021-2023 3. recovery of gaps in learning for at least 50% of students from rural areas, in the period 2021-2023, compared to 2019-2021, through examples and transfer of good practices in the field of professional training of pre-primary/primary school teachers
TARGET GROUP We educate 1401 students.215 will become pre-primary/primary school teachers.76.7% of the students come from rural areas.They carry out pedagogical training in our 17 primary classes and in the partner kindergartens,guided by 56 teachers who teach the methodology of the specialty,19 methodist school teachers,19 educators. INTERNAL CONTEXT Prioritizing the aspects to be improved,according to the SWOT analysis,the following needs were identified: -improving both graduates' preparation for the labor market, and the results of the tenure exam -regulating the learning process as a result of a continuous evaluation, taking into account the individual progress of the students -recovery of learning gaps between rural and urban students EXTERNAL CONTEXT From the statistics of the school inspectorate it emerged that: - in 2019, 56 of the pedagogical profile graduates,only 40% registered for the national tenure exam;4% of them became tenured - our graduates were on the first places in the exam,but 50% of those who remained in education system obtained marks lower than 7 - by questioning 60 of the graduates,we identified difficulties in solving Subject III of the tenure exam,which aims to evaluate the didactic process.