The interior can be looked at through two prisms: 1) the prism of the problem by the problem and 2) the prism of the opportunities that the problem presents for its resolution. We thus understood that there were different problems in the interior, and this impelled us to think and develop response actions. As a result of our reflections we believe that there was a predominant factor in the origin and the worsening of these problems - the isolation and the feeling of distance from the decision centres and the central political power, which ends up creating a spiral effect of the bottleneck of the problem itself. The interior and its communities are becoming more and more like islands, only isolated by land, where the isolation itself and the lack of opportunities and social and economic dynamics provoke, as a consequence, a worsening of that very isolation. A cycle that, in order to come to an end, requires the objectives and priorities of valorisation of the interior to be materialised in a structured way. This isolation seeks a dichotomous feeling and consequences on the one hand, the idea that the interior does not present the necessary conditions for the "construction" of young people's lives and that it is a place that has nothing, or very little, to offer young people. On the other hand, the exacerbation of the feeling of discrimination and distance from the decision-making centres and from political power, generating a feeling of disbelief and confidence in the democratic systems and in effective representativeness, an example of which is the strengthening of anti-establishment movements and discourses that have been seen throughout Europe. We therefore believe that it was vital to develop projects and structured actions aimed at demystifying and mitigating these feelings. We believe that it became relevant for the project to collaborate in order to achieve the following objectives: 1) Reinforcing the values of the European Project; 2) Clarifying the role of Europe and its strategies of proximity, stability and inclusion; 3) Awakening in young people the confidence and motivation to be active agents, reinforcing their involvement in public policies; 4) Empowering young people to become active voices and participative hands in the construction of their local communities; 5) Creating an instrument that enhances the active participation of young people in the democratic life of their communities. We believe that the most valuable resource of Europe and its states are people, to the extent of their knowledge, their motivation and their capacity for innovation and transformation. People are the strongest and most differentiating pillar of European culture, their sense of belonging to a greater cause is decisive in reinforcing the role of a Europe that is more plural, prosperous, inclusive, with more innovative traditions, values and open to others. The basic principles of Europe and the objectives outlined for this decade are broadly related to what we have developed in this project - to increase the feeling and motivation for a more active and horizontal participation, as a way to mitigate the feelings of isolation and distance from the political decision centres, to increase the active democratic participation of young people as a means to mitigate inequalities, feelings of distance and disbelief in the European democratic system. The literature and different academic currents point to the need for a transformation and a rebalancing between voters and elected representatives, and it is increasingly being argued more generally that the "old" democracies will have to reconfigure themselves so that they can maintain the essentials of their systems, In general, studies and academic thought point to the inversion of the concept of vertical democracy towards a more horizontal democracy, which means that it is considered important to increase and empower citizens' forums, promote initiatives such as participatory budgets, create moments of proximity consultation, facilitate the presentation of public and legislative measures by citizens. Deep down, what seems to be a new current for the structuring of democracy and democratic structures is nothing more than the recovery of the democratic beginnings of the discussion of POLIS in open, participatory and horizontal assemblies. In ancient times the great distinction had to do with the concept of citizen, access to these assemblies was limited by this condition. Although there is still a way to go, today the rights and the generalised identification of individuals as citizens is an immeasurable gain. It is important to create methods and ways to enable and facilitate democratic participation, and it is also important to strengthen the levels of democratic involvement and maturity.