The main objectives of the project were: student mobility (outgoing and incoming) for studies and internships; academic staff mobility for teaching and training purposes; and, more broadly, increasing the internationalization of the university, establishing new international contacts, expanding the scope of bilateral agreements, and improving language and social skills. Our activities were focused on ensuring equal and fair opportunities to participate in the Program and the further development of students, graduates, and university staff. Recruitment for the Program faced a great interest in the 2023/ 2024, both among students and university staff, and although we were ultimately able to provide fewer places than there were actual applications, we are pleased with the activity of students and staff who learn about the benefits of mobility under the ERASMUS+ program long before the recruitment process. We are also observing a steady increase in interest in participating in the Program, both in terms of mobility and activities undertaken within the university (e.g., expanding the range of courses taught by academic teachers in English).Despite several student withdrawals or departures under earlier agreements, we managed to exceed our plans for the Program. One of the students, after spending a semester abroad, extended her stay for another semester. There were also some mobility periods that were shorter than originally planned, but this did not affect the final settlement of accounts for the students after their return to the Academy. In 2023/2024, a total of 30 guests came to us for studies and staff mobility. We managed to extend our agreements with the University of Limerick and the University of Leipzig. We are pleased with the constant growth in awareness among our students, graduates, lecturers, and administrative staff about the objectives of the Program and the benefits of mobility. It is clear that our efforts are contributing to an increase in applications for academic exchange. Unfortunately, after completing their mobility, one of the students was mistakenly sent a link to the REPORT ON RECOGNITION instead of the PARTICIPANT REPORT. The student completed both reports, which meant that although 28 people actually went on mobility, the system showed that 29 reports had been submitted. The actual number of SMS mobilities is 19, but the system shows that 100% are 18 trips for the purpose of studying. The problem was reported to the National Agency, but unfortunately it could not be resolved. In addition, one of the students did not complete her survey due to very poor health. Bearing in mind the student's well-being, we refrained from further notification of the need to submit a report.